Before the ban actually took place, many American users were uncertain about the controversies surrounding TikTok and its future, leading some to explore alternative platforms.
The Shift to Xiaohongshu: Adaptation and Irony
In recent days, the United States witnessed a significant disturbance in the future of TikTok, so many users went to alternative platforms to continue engaging in social media. One of the most notable apps users moved to was Xiaohongshu, also known as Red Note, a Chinese social media app similar to TikTok. In a single day, Xiaohongshu gained nearly 3 million U.S. users, bringing it to the top of the U.S. app download charts. Originally launched in 2013 as a platform for product reviews and travel recommendations, Xiaohongshu has grown into a platform that combines social networking and lifestyle content, offering users a space to share experiences, discover products, and engage with a wide array of topics. Its aesthetically pleasing and lifestyle content made it an attractive option for American users seeking a new platform for creative expression. However, for all its appeal, Xiaohongshu presented challenges. The platform’s user interface and algorithms were not prepared for many American users accustomed to TikTok’s fine-tuned personalization features.
Originally, the TikTok ban stemmed from concerns about its Chinese ownership, yet millions of users migrated to another Chinese platform, trying to show the government the irony they were partaking in. This migration brought debates about the effectiveness and consistency of U.S. policies which targeted foreign tech companies.
Disruptions, and Cultural Tensions
On January 19, TikTok services were temporarily shut down across the U.S., leaving millions of users without access to the platform. This action followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a law that would require the parent company to take back its ownership of TikTok or face a ban. The shutdown has now marked a significant moment in the ongoing debate over foreign tech companies operating in the U.S., emphasizing the government’s determination to address these risks.
However, on the same day, TikTok began restoring its services after President-elect Donald Trump announced plans to issue an executive order extending the deadline for the parent company to divest its U.S. operations by 60 to 90 days. This extension was aimed at providing a chance for the company to negotiate some kind of deal that would allow TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. under partial American ownership. The development was seen as a lifeline for the platform and its vast community of creators, influencers, and small businesses that rely on TikTok for outreach and income.
When the TikTok ban finally took effect, the fallout was immediate. Creators and small businesses dependent on TikTok for revenue faced significant disruptions, even if it was just for a short time. For many, the platform wasn’t just a source of entertainment but a critical tool for income and livelihood. Some attempted to rebuild their audiences on Xiaohongshu, while others turned to platforms like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Despite these efforts, the loss of TikTok’s algorithm and massive user base left many feeling stranded.
The ban also reignited debates about data privacy and national security. While U.S. officials framed the move as a safeguard against potential Chinese government influence, critics pointed out the lack of concrete evidence linking TikTok to spy activities. This created skepticism about whether the ban was motivated more by political rivalry than genuine security concerns.
Xiaohongshu’s rise in popularity also drew attention from U.S. lawmakers. Although its content focus on lifestyle seemed less politically charged, concerns lingered about the app’s data practices and potential vulnerabilities to Chinese government oversight. American policymakers questioned whether Xiaohongshu’s growth represented a loophole in the broader effort to stop Chinese tech influence.
For Chinese users, the sudden influx of American users to Xiaohongshu sparked mixed reactions. While some welcomed the global attention as an opportunity for cultural exchange, others expressed frustration over perceived hypocrisy, as many Americans were not ‘respecting’ the original users on the app, with some even making racist comments and videos. Discussions on Chinese social media revealed skepticism toward the motivations of American users, especially given the U.S. government’s actions against TikTok. The cultural tension shows the complexities of globalized digital platforms and the challenges of dealing with global interactions.
A Complex Interplay of Policy, Technology, and Culture
The TikTok ban and its aftermath emphasize the challenges of regulating technology in an interconnected world. The migration to Xiaohongshu shows users’ adaptability but also raises questions about the motivations and implications of government policies targeting specific platforms. The ban’s impact extends beyond TikTok’s creators and users, reflecting broader tensions between national security, individual freedoms, and the realities of a global digital culture.
For creators, the ban’s uncertainty has driven efforts to diversify their social media presence to ensure resilience in case of future disruptions. Ultimately, this TikTok event showcases the complexity of government mixed with modern technology. As platforms continue to evolve and users adapt, the connection between policy, culture, and technology will continue to shape the digital scenery.
<Student Reporter Amber Thornal>thornalamber@gmail.com